Base Isolation Method
Base Isolation Method
Conventional Construction Practice assumes Fixed Base Structures
- The Dynamic Characteristics of Fixed Base Structures are determined by the general characteristics of the structural system
- The Designer can only slightly adjust those Dynamic Characteristics
- As a matter of fact, most common Building Structures have unfavorable Dynamic Characteristics that result in increased Seismic Response
Earthquake Performance of Fixed Base Structures
- Conventional Fixed Base Structures can not be realistically designed to remain elastic in large seismic events (more so in regions of high seismicity)
- Common practice is to design them so that they experience damage in a controlled manner and have large inelastic displacements potential
Unconventional Earthquake Protective Systems
Base Isolation is the most common System
The Concept of Base Isolation
Significantly Increase the Period of the Structure and the Damping so that the Response is Significantly Reduced
Base Isolation in Buildings
Isolator Components between the Foundation and Superstructure
Fig: An Isolation Interface is formed
How exactly does Base Isolation Work?
Most types of Isolators exhibit nonlinear behavior
Lengthening of the Structure’s Period and increased damping that result in a large scale decrease of the Seismic Response.
Force – Displacement Relationship at the Isolation Interface
Response of Base Isolated Buildings versus Fixed Base Response
Most Common Types of Isolation Components (Isolators)
Elastomeric Isolators –
Lead Core Rubber Bearings
Sliding Isolators
– Friction Pendulum System
– Friction Pendulum System
Friction Pendulum System
Examples of Buildings on Base Isolators
1. Oakland City Hall
· First high-rise government office building in the United States
· Tallest Building on the West Coast at the time of its construction in 1914 -324 feet tall
· Riveted Steel Frame with infill masonry walls of brick, granite and terracotta
· Continuous Reinforced Concrete Mat foundation
- Building was severely damaged during the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake
- Building is listed on the historic register – Retrofit had to preserve the interior architecture and the historic fabric of the building
- Both conventional fixed-base and base isolation retrofit concepts were studied
- The most economical and effective method was determined to be base isolation
Isolation System:
- 111 rubber isolation bearings
- 36 of them with lead cores
Critical Construction Issues:
- Temporary lateral bracing during construction period to safeguard against possible earthquake occurrence
- Symmetric work sequence was important to reduce the possibility of torsional response in the event of an earthquake
- Vertical column displacement during jacking was limited to around 0.10 inches to prevent damage to superstructure finishes
2. San Francisco City Hall
- Built in 1915
- Today recognized as one of the most notable examples of classical architecture in the U.S.
- Nearly 300 feet tall
- Steel Frame with concrete slabs
- Spread interior footings – Strip perimeter foundation
- The original design of the building incorporates a “soft story” approach at the main floor, intended to dissipate energy
- This alongside other discontinuities in the structural system make the dynamic characteristics of the building unfavorable
- The Building was severely damaged during the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake
- Based on the results of the analysis, the Base Isolation Scheme was selected as best meeting the retrofit objectives and providing the most favorable performance for the least relative cost
- Base Isolation is considered a particularly effective strategy when applied to massive (and rather stiff) structures
No comments:
Post a Comment